Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-04-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-04-07 Senate Journal Page 1028 SB 83 Senator Taylor moved that the following amendment to Amendment No. 16 be adopted: In Amendment No. 16: Following right-of-way for the Perseverance Trail,: Delete which includes Insert Mt. Roberts Trail, Sheep Creek Trail, Following to the City and Borough of Juneau, by: Delete April 1, 1998" Insert October 1, 1997" Following April 1, 1998": Delete , and that the City and Borough of Juneau and the Department of Natural Resources, division of parks and outdoor recreation, will continue discussions concerning transfer of ownership of the rights-of-way for the Mt. Roberts Trail and the Sheep Creek Trail. Insert . Objections were heard. Senator Kelly moved that the amendment to Amendment No. 16 be divided as follows: Part A: Following to the City and Borough of Juneau, by: Delete April 1, 1998" Insert October 1, 1997" 1997-04-07 Senate Journal Page 1029 SB 83 Part B: Following right-of-way for the Perseverance Trail,: Delete which includes Insert Mt. Roberts Trail, Sheep Creek Trail, Following April 1, 1998": Delete , and that the City and Borough of Juneau and the Department of Natural Resources, division of parks and outdoor recreation, will continue discussions concerning transfer of ownership of the rights-of-way for the Mt. Roberts Trail and the Sheep Creek Trail. Insert . President Miller ruled that the question was divisible. Without objection, the amendment to Amendment No. 16 was divided. The question being: Shall Part A of the amendment to Amendment No. 16 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 83(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 16 Part A YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Wilken and so, Part A of the amendment to Amendment No. 16 was adopted. 1997-04-07 Senate Journal Page 1030 SB 83 The question being: Shall Part B of the amendment to Amendment No. 16 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 83(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 16 Part B YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Leman, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Sharp, Wilken and so, Part B to the amendment to Amendment No. 16 failed. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 16 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 83(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Green, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Wilken Nays: Donley, Halford, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward and so, Amendment No. 16 as amended was adopted. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 83(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. 1997-04-07 Senate Journal Page 1031 SB 83 The question to be reconsidered: Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 83(FIN) am An Act making and amending appropriations; amending an appropriation from the constitutional budget reserve fund under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 83(FIN) am Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date Budget Reserve Fund YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 83(FIN) am passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Budget Reserve Fund section. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.